Another quick summary with a few thoughts along the way.
Thoughts and Summary:
The Pharisee and the Tax Collector at the temple (Luke 18:9-14)
Luke’s introduction
and conclusion pictures a God who will reverse the position of the arrogant
elite and the humble poor -David L. Balch.
This parable, unique to Luke, is one of my favourites because
the way it demands a response. When you read it you either say “Thank God I am
not like the Pharisee”, in which case you very much are like the Pharisee or you are empowered by the powerful, humble
prayer of the tax collector and the outcome described by Jesus.
The People
The Pharisee-
Pharisees were a group of Jewish
believers that were extremely pious believers who closely followed and study and
followed the law (Torah.) Not only this but in addition to the written law they
followed what an ancient Jewish historian named Josephus called “the tradition
of their fathers” or as Mark 7:5 describes the “tradition of the elders.” This
tradition seemed to add extra, more strict regulations to the law to help the
Pharisees in their individual pursuit of holiness. The name 'Pharisee' most
likely means “one who is separate” but it is not known whether this is a name they were called negatively or a name they called themselves and
embraced positively. In this parable however, it is clear that the Pharisee perceived
himself to be ‘separate’ positively- considering himself to be righteous whilst holding
others with contempt. Jesus critiques this view and instead the Pharisee stands
out as “one who is separate” in a negative way.
Pharisees occur frequently in the
gospels- more often than not in opposition and antagonistic towards Jesus and
his teachings. Jesus frequently condemned them for their lack of humility,
compassion and the hypocrisy and arrogance that seemed to be characteristic of
the movement. Luke’s gospel presents them as self promoting and obsessed with
self-righteous acts. Yet they held a deep respect for the law and being
faithful to God. Rejoicing and participating in the law was not a bad thing and
the NT does not always interpret the Pharisees negatively. It is worth mention that generally, the
Pharisees were staunchly anti-Roman and part of their obedience was in hope
that God would provide a saviour to rid and free them from the Roman Empire.
Tax Collectors worked for the Roman Empire and these tensions and beliefs sit
behind the parable.
The Tax Collector
Tax Collectors had the job of collecting revenue for the Roman
government. Most often there were private contractors that were required to pay
a set fee back to the Roman government but were able to keep anything over the
fixed amount as commission. As you can imagine, this led to a large amount of
corruption and abuse. To make things worse, the contracts for tax collector
were often given to wealthy foreigners. Often they picked on poorer farmers
trying to sell or move goods to the markets. Needless to say they were not
popular in first century Palestine. The Pharisees held them with such little regard they considered them unclean through there contact with gentiles. Often
these negative views come across through the pairing of sinners with tax
collectors (almost as if these words were synonymous) i.e. Luke 15:1, Matt
11:19, and Matt 9:11- “ When the
Pharisees saw this, they said to his disciples, “Why does your teacher eat with
tax collectors and sinners?”
The Story
Audience
The introduction tells us that Jesus told this parable to “some who were confident of their own righteousness and looked down on everybody else.” Who is
this audience? We don’t know. The
temptation would be to try and fill in the gaps and presume it was some
exceptionally bad and hypocritical people (maybe some Pharisees). But who is to
say he is not addressing the disciples? Who is to say it is not Jesus’ own
followers that trust in themselves and despise others? We as readers, should
not be tempted to exclude ourselves as being the audience Jesus in addressing
here (Joel Green mentions this). Either way, the introduction makes clear that
Jesus is about to make a connection and parallel the behavior and character of
the audience and the Pharisee.
Where do I stand?
The fact that the Pharisee notes he is glad he is not like
the Tax Collector is actually his undoing. The parable illustrates that it is
the tax collector who is justified. The Pharisee doesn't need to be condemned,
because he has done that himself in his admission that he thanks God he is not
like the tax collector.Additionally, Bailey notes he was probably praying aloud as per
Jewish custom. He comments on this
Such a voiced prayer would provide a golden opportunity to offer some
unsolicited ethical advice to the “unrighteous” around him who might not have
another opportunity to observe a man of his stratospheric piety! Most of us in
our spiritual journeys have, at some time or other, listened to a sermon hidden
in prayer.
It is, without a doubt, a ‘loaded’ prayer with a focus on
himself (note the repetition of ‘I’ in his prayer.) Whether it should even be
considered a prayer is up for debate. What
is certain is that his prayer lowers others and lifts himself up. But what
Christ teaches is that we lower ourselves and lift others up. I really
think the Tax Collectors prayer speaks for itself. There is no confusion as to
what is going on (except maybe the beating on the chest which was an ancient
form of mourning that you see often in the OT). The Tax Collector is simply
humble, transparent, and genuine, and for that is justified because “For
everyone who exalts himself will be humbles, and he who humbles himself will be
exalted“.
Yay Matt! Prolific much!
ReplyDelete